-

Welcome to the AbeBooks.com Community Forums! The forums are a place for you, our community of professional booksellers and avid book readers, to interact with one another - building the world's largest online community of book lovers.

Questions? If you are having difficulty getting started, please visit our F.A.Q.

Forgotten the title or author of a book? Visit our BookSleuth® Forum.



Back To Discussion List
 Avid Reader Book Club -  Discuss Pride and Prejudicenotify me whenever anyone posts in this discussionSubscribe  
 
From: HeatherB  Staff 9/29/2008 9:56 am 
To: ALL  (1 of 185) 
 18358.1 

Hi everyone,

We are reading Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen this October. I know I'm starting this thread a little earlier than normal, but I will be away at a conference from Oct 1-3 so I won't be posting as much as I usually do those three days.

At any rate, the thread is open and this book has a lot to say so let's dive in.

Cheers
Heather

 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: brainiac4  9/29/2008 11:53 am 
To: HeatherB  (2 of 185) 
 18358.2 in reply to 18358.1 
Have fun at your conference, Heather. What books you will you take in case it's boring? I think P and P has an exceptionally good first sentence. I have a copy with fine illustrations by Charles E. Brock, from about 1895, but they show the characters in authentic Regency dress. There are thumbnail links to some of them near the bottom of this very long web page: http://www.pemberley.com/janeinfo/ppbrokil.html.
 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: HeatherB  Staff 9/29/2008 1:34 pm 
To: brainiac4  (3 of 185) 
 18358.3 in reply to 18358.2 

Thanks brainiac. I'll be taking P and P with me on the trip. I think that's all I'll have time for. It's a packed schedule so I don't think there will be much down time.

Thanks for the link. I must say that while I love the period dresses I sure am grateful I don't have to wear corsets.

 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: sniffemout  9/29/2008 2:25 pm 
To: brainiac4  (4 of 185) 
 18358.4 in reply to 18358.2 
Hi Brian! I didn't know you had a copy of P&P with illustrations by Brock! smooch smooch!!!!

Sniffemout

Founder Member of the ACWP

Drongo of the Alice

Official NaNoWriMo Winner 2006 and 2007

 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: brainiac4  9/29/2008 2:28 pm 
To: sniffemout  (5 of 185) 
 18358.5 in reply to 18358.4 
Will you marry me? It's a set of the five main JA's.

Edited 9/29/2008 2:29 pm by brainiac4
 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: sniffemout  9/29/2008 2:40 pm 
To: brainiac4  (6 of 185) 
 18358.6 in reply to 18358.5 
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sniffemout

Founder Member of the ACWP

Drongo of the Alice

Official NaNoWriMo Winner 2006 and 2007

 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: HeatherB  Staff 9/30/2008 4:36 pm 
To: ALL  (7 of 185) 
 18358.7 in reply to 18358.6 

In an attempt to start the discussion and to keep it going while I'm away, I'm posting the first reading guide question.

Charlotte Brontė did not appreciate Pride and Prejudice. She felt that Jane Austen didn't write about her characters' hearts. Do you think Brontė's criticism is accurate? Is Austen's treatment of her characters' feelings superficial? Do they feel and/or express deep emotion?

Thoughts?

 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: brainiac4  10/1/2008 1:34 am 
To: HeatherB  (8 of 185) 
 18358.8 in reply to 18358.7 
Well, I suppose you could say that Jane Austen was a classical "composer", not a romantic, if that helps. She portrays her characters' feelings sure enough, but in their actions and social contexts, not in romantic, poetic terms. But the feelings of Miss Bates in "Emma", when Emma snubs her are deep and extremely realistically portrayed. You might say that JA's method works best for some emotions and CB's for others, but I don't think we're left in doubt as to when a JA character falls in love, for instance, or when a CB character meets a social setback (I'm trying to think of an example, in "Shirley", perhaps?) I find the realism of JA astonishing. Anyway, that's just a tentative beginning to an answer to a very complex question indeed. You've certainly left us something to chew over while you're whooping it up at your conference!
 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: pembe  10/1/2008 3:16 am 
To: brainiac4  (9 of 185) 
 18358.9 in reply to 18358.8 

What always strikes deep with me is the bit (again in Emma) where Jane Fairfax is escaping from the strawberry party and runs into Emma, who asks if she can help. I don't have the book to hand, but Jane  says something like: "We all know what it is to be exhausted in spirit as well as body. The greatest kindness you can do me is to let me go, and when asked, say I was required at home." 
But the fact it has made such a deep impression on me may (and I';m surprised to see myself writing this) support Heather's (or Charlotte Bronte's) argument - if this is so exceptional, does it mean that Jane Austen didn't - generally speaking - show the depth of her characters' feelings?

Pembe

 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: sam888  10/1/2008 5:15 am 
To: brainiac4  (10 of 185) 
 18358.10 in reply to 18358.5 
People have married for less compelling reasons:)
 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: brainiac4  10/1/2008 8:07 am 
To: pembe  (11 of 185) 
 18358.11 in reply to 18358.9 
Perhaps that's what distinguishes "Emma" from the other books. I've always thought it was the best by a long chalk.
 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: pembe  10/2/2008 11:30 pm 
To: brainiac4  (12 of 185) 
 18358.12 in reply to 18358.11 
Yes, it did flit across my mind as I typed, that both examples were from Emma. Emma herself annoys me, and Mr Knightley is too good to be true, but the book is full of spirit and life. Pride and Prejudice must always be my favourite, and when I just want to laugh I go to Northanger Abbey, but Emma certainly comes next.

Pembe

 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: Moggie  10/3/2008 1:23 pm 
To: brainiac4  (13 of 185) 
 18358.13 in reply to 18358.8 

I think your Romantic/Classical comment is truly valid, and it goes along with a distaste for pretence.

Elizabeth's reaction to Charlotte Lucas's comment on Jane and Bingley is, I take it, pretty much JA's own. Charlotte says of Jane, at the beginning of the Jane and Bingley's attachment, that Jane would be wiser to show more feeling for B than she feels, in order to fix him. E is rather shocked at the thought of such calculating behaviour - many commentators have pointed out that candour in human relationships is what JA values above all. In circumstances where to marry was the only reasonable career for a woman, there must always have been a temptation for them to act a little, to pretend a little, to more feelings than they actually had.

I think JA is a little harsh on Charlotte - but her treatment does demonstrate pretty well the effect of the pressures on a plain woman, not particularly well-off, who aspires to a 'good' marriage. C is a realist; she weighs up the advantages and disadvantages of marriage to Mr Collins, and positions herself accordingly; she gains in not becoming an old maid looking after her parents, she clears the way for her younger sisters and is in a position to help them, her brothers will not be ashamed of her, she has a respectable position in society, and the reversion of Mr Bennett's estate to look forward to, and will have her own household and children; the great drawback is Mr Collins - but she makes her dispoaitions to minimise that by seeing as little as possible of him by her choice of sitting-room and encouraging him to spend much time in the garden. In its own way, this is, I think, admirable, but far too calculating for the actions of an Austen heroine.

 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: sniffemout  10/3/2008 2:25 pm 
To: Moggie unread  (14 of 185) 
 18358.14 in reply to 18358.13 
Perhaps JA is more of an "in-depth" writer than people imagine? You have constructed Charlotte just from the small episodes in P&P where she speaks about her amibitions, and yet she we are supposed to be following Elizabeth's relationship with Darcy.

Sniffemout

Founder Member of the ACWP

Drongo of the Alice

Official NaNoWriMo Winner 2006 and 2007

 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: brainiac4  10/3/2008 2:27 pm 
To: Moggie unread  (15 of 185) 
 18358.15 in reply to 18358.13 
I haven't got as far as Mr Collins in my reread, but I think we may have been misled by the two BBC versions of P & P, into thinking that Mr Collins is foolish, whereas in the novel I seem to remember he was an insufferable prig and a hypocrite, which is not quite the same thing.
 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: brainiac4  10/3/2008 2:31 pm 
To: sniffemout  (16 of 185) 
 18358.16 in reply to 18358.14 
Yes, almost all her characters seem to be fleshed out to an extent that allows you to submerge yourself in the novel. Not that Charlotte Bronte doesn't flesh out her characters as well, but it takes her longer to do it and she works with fewer. Jane Austen is a real virtuoso in that respect, I think, so that a few lines are enough to give you EXACTLY the impression she wishes.
 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: sniffemout  10/3/2008 2:37 pm 
To: brainiac4  (17 of 185) 
 18358.17 in reply to 18358.16 
And ESPECIALLY when they are illustrated by Brock! <walks off sulkily kicking a pebble>

Sniffemout

Founder Member of the ACWP

Drongo of the Alice

Official NaNoWriMo Winner 2006 and 2007

 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: brainiac4  10/3/2008 2:46 pm 
To: sniffemout  (18 of 185) 
 18358.18 in reply to 18358.17 
Absolutely!
 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: Bosslady  10/4/2008 1:35 am 
To: brainiac4  (19 of 185) 
 18358.19 in reply to 18358.18 

The umpteenth sequel to P & P has just hit the bookshops, written this time by Colleen McCullough.

kitty.gif

 

 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: brainiac4  10/4/2008 2:56 am 
To: Bosslady  (20 of 185) 
 18358.20 in reply to 18358.19 
Wow. Can you take a peep and tell us how it ends?
 
   Options Reply 
  

Navigate this discussion:  1-20 21-40 41-60 ... 181-185
Rate My Interest:
   
Adjust text size:
Is this too complicated? Switch to Basic View

Back To Discussion List
-