-

Welcome to the AbeBooks.com Community Forums! The forums are a place for you, our community of professional booksellers and avid book readers, to interact with one another - building the world's largest online community of book lovers.

Questions? If you are having difficulty getting started, please visit our F.A.Q.

Forgotten the title or author of a book? Visit our BookSleuth® Forum.



Back To Discussion List
 General -  Contrasmagnificanjewelbangtantiability!notify me whenever anyone posts in this discussionSubscribe  
 
From: Manderley  3/9/2004 3:27 pm 
To: Wotan  (142 of 307) 
 2524.142 in reply to 2524.136 

Who needs rats? :)

You are definitely my choice for the 'Who the Man' thread. - Glowing smile!

Manderley

 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: melissakd  3/9/2004 3:58 pm 
To: Wotan  (143 of 307) 
 2524.143 in reply to 2524.128 

O hairy saint of the North,

     I was actually going to say 'tailpipe' at first, but at length it occurred to me that that would mean you were sucking in carbon monoxide.  I thought that would not have been your intention.  However, I am now having second thoughts about that as well.  I am hereby changing my mind: Go outside and start sucking that car off instanter, with my compliments.

 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: melissakd  3/9/2004 4:04 pm 
To: KitBallantyne  (144 of 307) 
 2524.144 in reply to 2524.132 

LARA---

     Quite welcome, old girl !  Started a fresh argument between me and the Hairy One !  Never too many of those, what !  Rather a hobby with me !  Jolly fun !  Sorry about your floorboards---take care when you drive in wet weather.  Unless of course you meant your house.  Also, please don't mind my calling you 'old girl.'  It is my understanding of the British that they consider this a term of endearment unrelated to age, and that is how I meant it.

MelissaKD

 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: KitBallantyne  3/9/2004 4:53 pm 
To: melissakd  (145 of 307) 
 2524.145 in reply to 2524.144 
well, i don't mind particularly, and you are right it isn't really age-related. but i don't know any other brits who use it nowadays. have you been reading wodehouse lately by any chance?
 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: Wotan  3/9/2004 4:57 pm 
To: Manderley  (146 of 307) 
 2524.146 in reply to 2524.142 

Claudia. [The Walhal Boa-Constrictor.]

I wish I could counterfeit surprise .... but it's Hard to be Humble.

 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: Wotan  3/9/2004 4:58 pm 
To: melissakd  (147 of 307) 
 2524.147 in reply to 2524.143 
I shall never cease to be astonished at the filthy minds of Hoosiers.
 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: melissakd  3/10/2004 3:46 pm 
To: Wotan  (148 of 307) 
 2524.148 in reply to 2524.127 
It's "Hoosier eejit."
 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: melissakd  3/10/2004 3:52 pm 
To: KitBallantyne  (149 of 307) 
 2524.149 in reply to 2524.145 

Dear Lara,

     Actually it's been at least a year (which is to say 100 books ago) since I read any Wodehouse.  I have always found language to be very  contagious.  When I was little, my sister and mother and I would take turns at reading aloud through various books; when we were on Lois Lenski, we immediately began talking like poor Southerners of half a century ago.  I adore Wodehouse and I guess the mere mention of him is enough to send me into a relapse.  You're probably lucky I didn't call you "old bean" or even "old flea."

MelissaKD

 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: melissakd  3/10/2004 3:57 pm 
To: Wotan  (150 of 307) 
 2524.150 in reply to 2524.126 

YOU SAID SO.

Of course it is only fair to admit that you later retracted the statement.  I had forgotten about the retraction.  My apologies.

MelissaKD

 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: melissakd  3/10/2004 4:01 pm 
To: Bosslady  (151 of 307) 
 2524.151 in reply to 2524.115 

Dear Boss,

     In the interest of excruciating fairness I must draw your attention to posting number 150 on this thread.

Yours sincerely,

MelissaKD

 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: Wotan  3/10/2004 11:57 pm 
To: melissakd  (152 of 307) 
 2524.152 in reply to 2524.150 
No I didn't, you bungle-brained numbskull!
 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: melissakd  3/11/2004 4:21 pm 
To: Wotan  (153 of 307) 
 2524.153 in reply to 2524.152 

You bloody did so !

It was on the Who would you invite to lunch ? thread, which is No. 1567.

Baensidhe posted a selection of persons and literature including romances, sci-fi, fantasy, Lord of the Rings, Sherlock Holmes, Peter Wimsey, Hercule Poirot, Jeeves and Wooster.  That was post number 1567.155.

You replied, and I quote, "Sherlock Holmes GOOD.  Everyone else BAD."

That looked like it meant Jeeves and Wooster.  I expressed my horror at this exhibition of dreadful taste, and you clarified your position on the subject, and I was much relieved.

When the topic arose again in the course of my post to this thread, I had forgotten about the retraction.  I said so and apologized, politely I thought, and all I got in return was outright disbelief and name-calling.  Look for yourself if you still don't believe me.  This is why El Magnifico !  is the man and you are not.

MelissaKD

P. S.  Reek.



Edited 3/11/2004 7:48 pm ET by melissakd

Edited 3/13/2004 5:45 pm ET by melissakd
 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: melissakd  3/11/2004 4:47 pm 
To: Guest unread  (154 of 307) 
 2524.154 in reply to 2524.152 

IF WOTAN LIVED IN THE HOOD:

Dear Blue,

     Here's my fantasy answer to post number 2524.152.  I did it to blow off steam and thought you'd get a kick out of it.  How'd I do ?

     Oh hayill no !  "No you di-in't" is right !  No you di-in't just dis me like that !  I'm 'bout to go ghetto fabulous on yo' a--!  Y'all so smug, like you da cat who ate the canary.  Frontin' in yo' ole Lincoln Town Car like you da ish; you cou'in't pick up a hooker in dat sorry old beater.  How you really gon' pretend you ain't say dat about Wodehouse ?  You can't even admit you really said it; you got to be talkin' smack about me and my intellect.  You Mistah Playa on the Forum, but I see through dat.  You a scrub.  You lame.  You just think you all dat an' a Big Mac. Huh ?  What that ?  What you say?  Ad hominem ?  So's you ol' man !

     In the last line I used "you" rather than "yo" to mean "your," which I believe is a correct alternative, especially when used before the vowel in question.  "Yo" of course is also a common exclamation and occasionally can mean "you."  At least that is my understanding.

Yours in scholarship,

MelissaKD



Edited 3/13/2004 5:45 pm ET by melissakd
 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: Wotan  3/11/2004 10:04 pm 
To: melissakd  (155 of 307) 
 2524.155 in reply to 2524.153 
I hereby ratify the judgement expressed in 2524.152. Here I stand: I can do no other.

Edited 3/12/2004 1:04 am ET by Wotan
 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: Holly9  3/12/2004 12:53 pm 
To: ElMagnifico  (156 of 307) 
 2524.156 in reply to 2524.45 
Did Mr. Bush really say that?  -- oh, darn, you're off for several days and I'll haver forgotten I asked this by the time you reappear!  I miss you already! 
Holly9
 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: Holly9  3/12/2004 12:55 pm 
To: Brianna  (157 of 307) 
 2524.157 in reply to 2524.1 
Have you seen Libraryladytoo's thread over on Booksleuth Forum regarding trying to make some improvements?  I don't know if any of her suggestions can be achieved, but someone from ABE should read them. 
Holly9
 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: melissakd  3/13/2004 2:48 pm 
To: Wotan  (158 of 307) 
 2524.158 in reply to 2524.155 

Thank you.

MelissaKD.

 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: Wotan  3/13/2004 3:22 pm 
To: melissakd  (159 of 307) 
 2524.159 in reply to 2524.158 
De nada, 'lisserino!
 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: melissakd  3/14/2004 2:45 pm 
To: Wotan  (160 of 307) 
 2524.160 in reply to 2524.159 

"Nada" is indeed the mot juste.

M.



Edited 3/14/2004 5:46 pm ET by melissakd
 
   Options Reply 
  

 
From: Wotan  3/14/2004 3:26 pm 
To: melissakd  (161 of 307) 
 2524.161 in reply to 2524.160 
I'm proud to have received your approval, 'lissa.
 
   Options Reply 
  

Navigate this discussion:  1 ...102-121 122-141 142-161 162-181 182-201 ... 302-307
Rate My Interest:
   
Adjust text size:
Is this too complicated? Switch to Basic View

Back To Discussion List
-